Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Federico Iannaccone vs Jakub Paul Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Iannaccone vs Paul analysis and find out who is favored!
Federico Iannaccone vs Jakub Paul Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Iannaccone 1 - 0 Paul
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Iannaccone has won 49.22% of points on their second serve, while Paul has won 51.21%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Iannaccone, in recent form, has won 54.96% of their opponent's second serve points, while Paul has won 58.19%. The same stats for first serve returns are 39.39% and 36.78% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Iannaccone has saved 55.76% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Paul has saved 59.14% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Iannaccone has won 56.76% of matches played (W/L 42/ 32), with Paul winning 62.69% (W/L 42/ 25) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Iannaccone has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 51/ 38), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 43% (W/L 6/ 8). Paul has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 64/ 37), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 48% (W/L 28/ 30).
- Player level: In the last year, Iannaccone has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 63.64% of matches (W/L 28/ 16), where as Paul has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 67.27% of matches (W/L 37/ 18). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Iannaccone winning 1 times and Paul being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Iannaccone winning 2 and Paul winning 0. The last match between Iannaccone and Paul was at the M25 Sion, 01-09-2023, Quarterfinals, Clay with Federico Iannaccone getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:52:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Iannaccone and Paul have played a deciding set 0 times, with Iannaccone winning 0 times and Paul 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Iannaccone winning 0, and Paul 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Iannaccone has played against opponents with an average rank of 267.41 while Paul has played against players with an average rank of 226.79.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Iannaccone has won 47% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Paul has won 44% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Iannaccone has converted 50.98% of breakpoint opportunities, and Paul has converted 51.09% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
486
Rank
474
High
25
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
516
Rank
438
High
25
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
Form
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
53% (166-146)
Career Total W/L
54% (177-148)
56% (20-16)
YTD W/L
59% (17-12)
$0
Career Prize Money
$2,285
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Iannaccone VS Paul H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Federico Iannaccone | Jakub Paul |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:52:0 | 1:52:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 89% (50/56) | 60% (47/78) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 72% (36/50) | 53% (25/47) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 17% (1/6) | 48% (15/31) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 27% (4/15) | 33% (1/3) |
| Return Points W% | 49% (38/78) | 34% (19/56) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Iannaccone VS Paul H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-3 |
Stats 
Federico Iannaccone
Player
Jakub Paul
89%
(
50 of
56)
1st Serve %
60%
(
47 of
78)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
0
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
17%
(
1 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
38 of
78)
75
Total Points Won
59
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Federico Iannaccone | Jakub Paul |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 56% (20/16) | 59% (17/12) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 55% (47/38) | 57% (38/29) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (412/349) | 53% (326/291) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 61% (11/7) | 60% (9/6) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 53% (8/7) | 57% (4/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (1/2) | 57% (4/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.08 | 0.12 |
| Aces Total | 28 | 36 |
| DFs per game | 0.21 | 0.15 |
| DFs Total | 78 | 45 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:2:20 | 1:40:20 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 282.03 | 249.14 |
| 1st Serve % | 72% (1777/2479) | 67% (1324/1986) |
| 1st Serve W% | 61% (1081/1777) | 63% (829/1324) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (345/701) | 50% (333/662) |
| BPs Won% Total | 51% (156/306) | 50% (109/218) |
| Return Pts W% | 45% (1141/2522) | 43% (879/2027) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 40% (4/6) | 63% (5/3) |
| Futures W/L | 62% (16/10) | 60% (12/8) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 57% (20/35) | 57% (16/28) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 25% (2/8) | 71% (5/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (6/12) | 50% (4/8) |
| 1st set W, W | 78% (18/14) | 88% (16/14) |
| 1st set W, L | 22% (18/4) | 13% (16/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 33% (18/6) | 23% (13/3) |
Federico Iannaccone Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Dmitry Popko
Player
Federico Iannaccone
49%
(
39 of
79)
1st Serve %
85%
(
71 of
84)
6
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
44 of
71)
68%
(
27 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
35%
(
28 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
84)
87
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 2-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Federico Iannaccone
Player
Hazem Naow
95%
(
54 of
57)
1st Serve %
69%
(
37 of
54)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
33%
(
1 of
3)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
67
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Federico Iannaccone
Player
Alexander Weis
83%
(
38 of
46)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
74)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
58%
(
22 of
38)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
75%
(
6 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
6 of
33)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
18 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
43 of
74)
71
Total Points Won
49
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Adrian Oetzbach
Player
Federico Iannaccone
54%
(
43 of
79)
1st Serve %
74%
(
49 of
66)
0
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
4
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
42%
(
15 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
44%
(
35 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
35 of
66)
79
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Giovanni Fonio
Player
Federico Iannaccone
76%
(
91 of
120)
1st Serve %
82%
(
77 of
94)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
0
65%
(
59 of
91)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
49 of
77)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
40%
(
48 of
120)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
36 of
94)
108
Total Points Won
106
|
3-6 6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gabriel Debru
Player
Federico Iannaccone
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
72%
(
57 of
79)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
42 of
79)
76
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elmer Moller
Player
Federico Iannaccone
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve %
64%
(
34 of
53)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
2
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
37%
(
23 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Iannaccone
Player
Daniele Minighini
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve %
72%
(
21 of
29)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
0
44%
(
12 of
27)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
47%
(
17 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
72%
(
21 of
29)
40
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Andrea Picchione
Player
Federico Iannaccone
58%
(
19 of
33)
1st Serve %
72%
(
34 of
47)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
84%
(
16 of
19)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
9 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
53
Total Points Won
27
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Federico Iannaccone
Player
Carlos Sanchez Jover
73%
(
45 of
62)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
14 of
39)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
44%
(
27 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
71
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Jakub Paul Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Dutra Da Silva
Player
Jakub Paul
67%
(
60 of
90)
1st Serve %
73%
(
61 of
83)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
34 of
61)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
41%
(
37 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
38 of
83)
91
Total Points Won
82
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jakub Paul
Player
Rio Noguchi
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve %
53%
(
25 of
47)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
75%
(
6 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
58
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jakub Paul
Player
Alen Mujakic
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve %
67%
(
42 of
63)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
50
|
6-0 2-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Jakub Paul
69%
(
68 of
98)
1st Serve %
61%
(
68 of
111)
8
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
79%
(
54 of
68)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
43 of
68)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
31 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
46 of
111)
113
Total Points Won
96
|
6-3 6-7(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Enzo Couacaud
Player
Jakub Paul
55%
(
29 of
53)
1st Serve %
61%
(
30 of
49)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
59
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jakub Paul
Player
Daniel Michalski
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve %
65%
(
49 of
75)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
17 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
43 of
75)
69
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jakub Paul
Player
Tristan Lamasine
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve %
56%
(
42 of
75)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
8
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
37 of
75)
77
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Amr Elsayed
Player
Jakub Paul
67%
(
81 of
121)
1st Serve %
72%
(
74 of
103)
5
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
0
68%
(
55 of
81)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
51 of
74)
48%
(
19 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
47 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
41 of
103)
115
Total Points Won
109
|
6-7(8) 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Illya Beloborodko
Player
Jakub Paul
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
66)
5
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
0
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
33 of
66)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Henri Squire
Player
Jakub Paul
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve %
71%
(
37 of
52)
8
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Iannaccone Vs Paul Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
